yeah, we're gonna get ****ed over for this
Thats...amazing, there's just so much wrong with it. He wants agents of the state to discriminate at will based on their religion, I assume this wont apply only to gay couples. Maybe we'll see a Baptist vs Quaker "civil" war. Then he equates the discriminators with the persecuted and blames the victims. I imagine the Kansas state supreme court will knock this down if the Feds dont beat them to it. If the state says its actors can enforce their religion on constituents they've established religion in violation of the 1st Amendment (and 14th).
Only marriage? Why cant state employees discriminate against people for violating other religious beliefs? If a person dont care about marriage but is a vegan or some religion that dis-allows certain foods, aren't they being persecuted if they cant deny service to infidels?
The unpopular bill has overwhelming support
"Discrimination is horrible. It’s hurtful … It has no place in civilized society, and that’s precisely why we’re moving this bill," Macheers said. "There have been times throughout history where people have been persecuted for their religious beliefs because they were unpopular. This bill provides a shield of protection for that."
While government agencies would still be mandated to render services to Kansans, individual clerks would be empowered to refuse assistance to individuals that violated their religious beliefs on marriage.
The unpopular bill has overwhelming support
Comment